Sugar Daddy is reelected
Nov. 6, 2012 is a day that will live in infamy. On that day, Americans, (and some illegal aliens) gave Obama 50.9 percent of the vote, defeating Romney by 3.6 percent. Obama won DC and 26 states to Romney’s 24.
Nearly a billion dollars was spent by the Republican Party and its Super PAC allies to defeat Obama - yet he won. Why?
Obama could not defend his failures, so he did little else but run attack ads against Romney and make more empty promises. For the most part, Romney failed to defend himself against Obama’s attack ads, most of which were misleading and deceitful. When someone keeps smearing you, and you don’t defend yourself, at some point people are going to decide the ads must be true. This is what happened. Had Romney vigorously defended himself, he would be president elect.
Romney failed to put out a coherent economic plan for fixing the economy - another key reason Romney lost.
Additionally, the mainstream media and most local media markets were very biased for Obama.
So now that Sugar Daddy has won, what are intelligent people to do? Does any intelligent person believe Obama's policies will lead America back to economic prosperity and balanced budgets? Anyone with an ounce of brains knows this will not happen and events will prove us right. Obama's intentions are to destroy the economy with unmanageable debt and with it the defense capability of this country.
How can Obama’s suicidal policies be stopped? It’s up to the Republican controlled House to do that. If the Republican House puts forth good economic bills and then refuses to cave against Obama and his lackeys in the mainstream media, there is hope. Obama CAN be stopped.
What true Americans need to do is openly support the Republicans in Congress so they have the fortitude to oppose Obama.
A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves money from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by an increasingly authoritarian government.