Mexico’s secret War against the U.S.
Two sections: 1) Hating America and Anglos, 2) All Mexican claims are false
1) Hating America and Anglos
Americans today are faced with an issue that we have never faced before. In the past millions of immigrants came to America who were appreciative of America’s freedom, the Rule of Law and blended into America. These immigrants were often more patriotic then native born citizens and were a tremendous asset to our country.
While many Mexicans are here for a better life and appreciate America, many are invaders. These Mexicans - some are illegals, some are legal immigrants and some are actually citizens who are American in name only - are full of hatred against America and especially white or ‘Anglo’ Americans. They are racists, ethnic supremacists and xenophobes who believe they have the moral right to ignore our border. Their intentions are to either evict ‘Anglos’ or turn them into second class citizens and turn the southwest US into a semi - autonomous Mexican state within the US or an independent country - starting with California. The fact that so few people understand that this is an invasion that must be physically confronted is a testimony to the media’s refusal to report something politically incorrect. Consider the following hate speech:
Augustin Cebada, Information Minister of the Brown Berets, para-military soldiers of Aztlan movement shouting at U.S. citizens at an Independence Day rally at the Federal Building in Westwood, July 4, 1996:

“. . . We're here in Westwood, this is the fourth time we've been here in the last two months, to show white Anglo-Saxon Protestant L.A., the few of you who remain, that we are the majority, and we claim this land as ours, it's always been ours, and we're still here, and none of this talk about deporting. If anyone's going to be deported it's going to be you!”
A woman with Cebada: “Go back to Simi Valley, you skunks! Go back to Woodland Hills! Go back to Boston! Go back to the Plymouth Rock, Pilgrims! Get out! We are the future. You're old and tired. Go on. We have beaten you, leave like beaten rats.”
Cebada: “You old white people, it is your duty to die. Even their own ethicists say that they should die, that they have a duty to die. They're taking up too much space, too much air. We are the majority in L.A. There's over seven million Mexicans in L.A. County alone. We are the majority. And you're going to see every day more and more of it, as we manifest as our young people grow up and graduate from high school, go on to college and start taking over this society. The vast majority of our people are under the age of 15 years old. Right now we're already controlling those elections, whether it's through violence or nonviolence. . .’(1)
---------------------------------------
On March 27, 2010, rancher Bob Krentz was murdered on his property in southeastern Arizona. Authorities believe Krentz was killed by an illegal border crosser but his murder has never been solved.
Manuel Longoria of Nuestros Reconquistos says he feels bad for Krentz’s murder (as well as the murder of his dog), but believes that part of the frustration is that Krentz was working on Aztlán, the area of the United States he claims was stolen from Mexico. “Murder is never the way to solve things. However, Americans put themselves at risk for occupying stolen land. It would be a lot safer if they didn’t.”(2)(3)
---------------------------------------
MALDEF (Mexican American Legal Defense Fund) is another hate group. (4) MALDEF was co-founded in 1968 by Mario Obledo and Pedro Tijerina. Obledo wants White People to go back to Europe. Obledo made this statement at least twice, during an appearance on Ray Briem's talk radio show in May or June of 1998, and again on the Tom Leykis' talk radio show:
Obledo: "We're going to take over all the political institutions of California. In five years the Hispanics are going to be the majority population of this state."
Caller: "You also made the statement that California is going to become a Hispanic state, and if anyone doesn't like it, they should leave. Did you say that?"
Obledo: "I did. They ought to go back to Europe."(5)
---------------------------------------
Reies Tijerina (1926 – 2015) rose to prominence in the 1960s by claiming the U.S. had stolen land grants to Mexicans following the Mexican American War of 1848. Tijerina’s lifetime goal was to return the southwest U.S. to Mexico and drive all “Anglos” back to Europe. Tijerina’s autobiography - They Called Me “King Tiger” (6) - contains an astounding number of factual errors.
“I would limit myself to talking about the struggle for the land, the land that belonged to my people since the signing of the Treaty of Tordecillas on June 7, 1494.”(p 218)
“The Jews are fleeing to their land since 1947. And if the Anglo helps us, one day he’ll have to do the same, because we have roots here and the Anglo doesn’t.”(p 39)
“Soon, our brothers in Mexico will know that our dreams are their dreams. We are the bones and Mexico is the spirit. And this is the hour for the bones and the spirit to join. We are going to be the bridge to unite true Mexico with abandoned Mexico.”(p 212) Tijerina spoke at La Raza Unida Party’s first annual convention in 1972.




Rodolfo “Corky” Gonzales (1928 - 2005), has been portrayed as a civil rights leader in the media and US history textbooks in public schools and colleges. Nothing could be further from the truth. An examination of Gonzales’s autobiography - Message to Aztlan (7) - proves he was an ethnic supremacist - a racist who promoted ethnic separation, domination and xenophobia. Gonzales also uses the Treaty of Tordesillas to declare legal title to the Southwest US.
“We are all heirs to the land. We, the mestizo, the Indian, and of Spanish birth, owners of the Southwest by precedent and by legal title.”(p 80)
Nobody can destroy the spirit of our people. And they can kill individuals, they can shoot us down in the streets, and they have. They can throw us in their jails, but they cannot destroy an idea of a philosophy, and they can never destroy love, because we’re going to win. We’re going to beat them, whether it takes this generation, the next generation, or the next generation. We’re going to win. Viva La Raza! Viva La Raza Libre! Viva Aztlan Libre!”(p 89)

Armando Navarro, Professor of Ethnic Studies, UC Riverside at Latino Summit Response to Prop 187, UC Riverside, 1/1995
“It's a game - it's a game of power - who controls it. You (to MEChA students) are like the generals that command armies. We're in a state of war. This Proposition 187 is a declaration of war against the Latino/Chicano community of this country. They know the demographics. They know that history and time is on our side. As one community, as one people, as one nation within a nation as the community that we are, the Chicano/Latino community of this nation. What this means is a transfer of power. It means control."(8)

In 1994, Californians voted on Proposition 187. This was a response to increasing illegal immigration, crime and costs to the taxpayers. The state was spending over $3 BILLION a year in aid to illegal aliens. Proposition 187 had this introduction: “The People of California find and declare as follows: That they have suffered and are suffering economic hardship caused by the presence of illegal immigrants in this state. That they have suffered and are suffering personal injury and damage caused by the criminal conduct of illegal immigrants in this state. That they have a right to the protection of their government from any person or persons entering this country unlawfully.” Proposition 187 passed by 59 to 41 percent but was eventually declared unconstitutional by liberal judges after being challenged in court by La Raza, the morally clueless Clinton administration and other anti-American hate groups.
-----------------------------
Larry Elder, an L.A. radio talk show host read a letter from one of his listeners:
"Dear Larry, I spent ten years as a cruise hostess working at sea on cruise ships all over the world, so many of my assignments were to the Mexican Riviera, going back to the destination over and over again working friendships with many of the local people working along side of us in the Mexican tourist industry. Larry, the one phrase I heard a hundred times or more was, 'When the revolution is over.' When I asked for information, always the same answer, 'When they have California back.' Young or old, it seems they grew up being taught there would be a revolution some day. Somehow they would have California back."(9)


Art Torres, former state senator and Chairman of the California Democratic Party from 1996 to 2009 spoke at UC Riverside in Jan. 1995:
"Que viva la causa! It is an honor to be with the new leadership of the Americas, here meeting at UC Riverside. So with 187 on the ballot, what is it going to take for our people to vote - to see us walking into the gas ovens? It is electoral power that is going to make the determination of where we go as a community. And power is not given to you -- you have to take it. Remember: 187 is the last gasp of white America in California. Understand that. And people say to me on the Senate floor when I was in the Senate, 'Why do you fight so hard for affirmative action programs?' And I tell my white colleagues, 'because you're going to need them.'”(10)

David Sanchez is the Founder and self declared ‘Prime Minister’ of the Brown Berets. An objective examination of Sanchez’s autobiography - Expedition through Aztlan (11) - proves that he is another ethnic supremacist - a racist who promotes ethnic separation, domination and xenophobia. His book also contains a huge number of factual errors and lies.
“. . .El Paso is where the U.S. Immigration Headquarters had the largest traffic of detention and deportation of Mexican undocumented persons. We were demanding that the racist practices of the Immigration Department be ceased immediately. . . We were calling for an end to all secondary border inspections which caused double harassment, and were demanding that all immigration officers be disarmed.” (p150)
In August 1972, the Brown Berets occupied Catalina Island off the coast of California and claimed it for Mexico. Twenty six members of the Brown Berets scaled a mountain and posted a large Mexican flag. On Sep. 26, forty law enforcement personal surrounded the camp and gave the Brown Berets one hour to leave. The occupation was over.(p 179 - 189)

In 1998, the US played Mexico in a championship soccer game in Los Angeles. Fans were overwhelmingly pro-Mexican. They booed the US team, booed during the playing of the US national anthem and US players were spat at and trash was thrown at them. There have been similar incidents since.

2) All Mexican claims are false
* The U.S. did NOT provoke Mexico into starting the Mexican American War.
* This sounds crazy, but many Mexicans believe a 500 year old treaty, called the Treaty of Tordecillas, signed on June 7, 1494, gives Mexicans the legal and moral right to ignore the border and claim parts of the US for Mexico.
* This is even crazier. When the Spanish intermarried with native indians from 1514 on, they became a ‘new race’ - Mestizo or the ‘Cosmic People.’
1. Mexican American War:
Mexico claims the US is responsible for the Texas rebellion in 1835 and the Mexican American War of 1846. The FACTS prove that Mexico was responsible for starting both wars.
Texas was just one of three states rebelling against Santa Anna in 1835 - but only the Texas rebellion was successful. States rebelling against the central government was common. In 1823 - only 2 years after Mexico’s independence - five states in Central America declared themselves independent from Mexico. Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua and Costa Rica established the United Provinces of Central America in Guatemala City. Constant infighting resulted in the Union falling apart in 1838. The five states became independent nations without any threats of war from Mexico, but Mexico vowed never ending war on Texas because they were defeated by Anglos instead of fellow Spanish.
Mexican pride could not accept the fact that they lost to Texas. But this colossal stain on Mexican pride could be fixed if Mexico reconquered Texas. In Jan. 1846, General Mariano Paredes overthrew the government with one stated objective - start a war with the U.S. and conquer Texas.
In a letter dated Apr 18, 1846, Paredes wrote to General Arista “It is indispensable that hostilities begin, yourself taking the initiative.” On April 25, 1846, 1,600 Mexican troops crossed the Rio Grande and ambushed a force of 80 American troops. Eleven men were killed and the rest taken prisoner.
The U.S. declared war on Mexico. On September 13, 1847, the U.S. Army entered Mexico City and Santa Anna fled the country.


On Feb 2, 1848, the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was signed, ending the war. The treaty gave the U.S. almost half of Mexico’s territory north of the Rio Grande River. Mexicans believe this treaty was unduly harsh on Mexico. So the real issue today is this: Even if Mexico is 100% to blame for starting both wars - which they were - did the US have the right to take almost half of Mexico’s territory? The answer is ABSOLUTELY YES!! Here’s why:
Mexico was determined to conquer Texas and was looking for an excuse to start this war because they were certain they could defeat the US. But Mexico lost every major battle. To have beaten Mexico as badly as we did, conquered most of their country including the capital city, and then told them they must accept Texas as part of the US, which it already was, and then retreated back to the U.S. would not have been fair to us. This would have been an unforgivable disgrace to the men who died and the rest who went through hell to attain victory - and we would be inviting another attack.
Now put yourself in Mexico’s shoes. Your army has been repeatedly defeated, nearly the entire country has been conquered, and the consequences are - nothing!! Just be nice and don’t threaten Texas again! In a machismo society like Mexico, would they sit back and say ‘OK’ or would Mexicans think we Americans are unbelievably gullible. Mexico would hold Americans in contempt for conquering their country and not making them pay a price for their warmongering. The reality is that once Mexico attacked the US, losing the land north of the Rio Grande became necessary to repay the US for the cost of the war and repay US citizens for monetary damages Mexico refused to pay. This was the consequences of attacking the US.
If the US could change history, what could we change so Mexico would love us today? If we only kept Texas and gave back California and New Mexico, would Mexico still hate us for keeping Texas? Absolutely yes. If we gave Texas to Mexico, would they love us? No, Mexico would still be bashing America and sending drugs and illegal aliens into all parts of our country. They already are. Giving Texas and the southwest US to Mexico would gain us nothing.
Most Mexicans believe that if they had kept ownership of “Aztlan,” this area would be economically prosperous like it is now. This is wishful - even delusional thinking. These areas became prosperous because they belong to the U.S., not Mexico. Had these lands stayed under the control of Mexico, this part of Mexico would be as dysfunctional as the rest of Mexico. All that would change is that constant revolutions, widespread poverty, a disastrous economic system, bad health care, poor education, political turmoil and murderous drug cartels would be in a country twice as large as it is now. Even more illegal immigrants from Mexico would be coming into our considerably smaller country looking for jobs.(12)
2. the Treaty of Tordecillas, signed on June 7, 1494
This treaty between Spain and Portugal settled their conflicts over land in the New World. Portugal got Brazil and Spain the rest of the New World. Some Mexicans use this treaty today to claim God ordained ownership of the southwest US and some Mexicans even use this treaty to claim most of the US and parts of Canada. However, their assertions are fatally flawed. Since no other country signed this treaty, they were not obligated to obey it. In addition, Mexicans ignore all subsequent treaties after the Treaty of Tordecillas. In 1819, Spain signed the Adams-Onis Treaty, which ceded Florida to the US and settled other bounday disputes. In 1848, Mexico signed the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo which ended the Mexican American War. The treaty transfered the Southwest to the U.S. For these reasons, the U.S. has legal ownership of all of the U.S. CASE CLOSED.
3. Mestizo or the ‘Cosmic People.’
The National Council of La Raza (NCLR), now UnidosUS, La Raza Unida Party (RUP), Reies Tijerina and others are all supportive of the “Cosmic People” scam.
Most Mexicans today claim they are ‘Mestizo’ or ‘Cosmic’ - meaning they are mixed Spanish and Indian. The BIG SCAM now is to claim they are not immigrants to the New World, but instead they have been here thousands of years. They believe - or pretend to believe - this new status gives them the moral and legal right to ignore the border between the U.S. and Mexico and attack ‘Anglos.” They declare that “we didnʼt cross the border, the border crossed us.”
A Mexican ‘philosopher’ by the name of Jose Vasconcelos (1882 - 1959) came up with the Cosmic Race scam and many Mexicans bought into it so they could feel superior and above the law.
Vasconcelos: “It seems as if God Himself guided the steps of the Anglo-Saxon cause. . .” “Spanish colonization created mixed races, this signals its character, fixes its responsibility, and defines its future.” “Its predestination obeys the design of constituting the cradle of a fifth race. . .” “The dispersion will come to an end on American soil;” “The so-called Latin peoples ... are the ones called upon to consummate this mission. . .” “. . . The Anglo-Saxons are gradually becoming more a part of yesterday.” “We in America shall arrive, before any other part of the world, at the creation of a new race fashioned out of the treasures of all the previous ones: The final race, the cosmic race.”(13) Vasconcelos beliefs have similarities with the German and Japanese belief in a superior race prior to World War Two.
The FACTS are that nearly all the Indian tribes that intermarried with Mexicans were located entirely in present day Mexico. There was very minimal intermarriage between Indians and Mexicans in present day southwest U.S. because there were very few Indians and fewer Mexicans. Virtually all self proclaimed Mestizo Mexicans are NOT indigenous to the southwest US and have no claim to this land.
At any rate, being part Indian doesnʼt make you superior or ‘Cosmic’ or above the law. It means you're part Indian. Why do all Mestizos have Spanish names? What happened to all the Indian names? What about “Anglo” Americans who are part Indian? Are they a new race of beings? Can they ignore the border with Mexico and do as they please? Letʼs remember that Mexico and all other countries enforce their border so we can too.
There is no rule on how long someone has to live in a place before they become a ‘native.’ Most Americans have been here over 100 years and many over 200 years. That’s long enough to be a native. We’re staying. .

Jose Angel Gutierrez, ‘professor’ at the University of Texas at Arlington and a founder of La Raza Unida:“The border remains a military zone. We remain a hunted people. Now you think you have a destiny to fulfill in this land that historically has been ours for forty thousand years, and we're a new Mestizo nation. And they want us to discuss civil rights. Civil rights! What law made by white men to oppress all of us of color, female and male! This is our homeland. We cannot, we will not, and we must not be made illegal in our own homeland. We are not im-mi-grants that came from another country to another country; we are migrants, free to travel the length and breadth of the Americas because we belong here. We are millions. We just have to survive. We have an aging white America. They are not making babies. They are dying. It's a matter of time. [laughter] The explosion is in our population.”(12)
Conclusions
With the rise of drug cartels and rampant crime in Mexico, the fervor for uniting ‘Atzlan’ with Mexico has subsided over the past couple of decades - though this is still the goal for many. Most Mexicans come to the U.S. to find a job and escape the poverty and violence in Mexico. Why would Mexicans want to go back to what they escaped from? However, what has NOT changed is the belief by nearly all Mexicans that Americans are on land stolen from Mexico. Their goal is to dominate the state politically and culturally. What Mexicans fail to realize is they stole the land from the Indians - so THEY are on stolen land.
The situation today has imperalist Mexicans uniting with radical Americans to take over control of the democrat party to carry out the political left’s hate-America agenda:
Feb 2021